actions/ssh-key-action
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/shimataro/ssh-key-action.git synced 2025-06-19 22:52:10 +10:00
Code Activity

* sending -> transferring

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
shimataro 2020-01-26 17:32:09 +09:00
parent 3e02311a46
commit 7f9532b37c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: BE92C05736911A9D
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md
View file

@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ It has some advantages over other methods:
* Of course, it is necessary to install bastion public key on servers, and server keys on bastion. But you don't have to update workflow files and `secrets` even if number of servers changed. * Of course, it is necessary to install bastion public key on servers, and server keys on bastion. But you don't have to update workflow files and `secrets` even if number of servers changed.
* `rsync`: * `rsync`:
* is faster than others. * is faster than others.
* will **NOT** break files even if disconnected during sending. * will **NOT** break files even if disconnected during transferring.
* can remove files that don't exist in server. * can remove files that don't exist in server.
* SCP is [deprecated by OpenSSH](https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-8.0) due to outdated and inflexible protocol. * SCP is [deprecated by OpenSSH](https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-8.0) due to outdated and inflexible protocol.
* Using bastion is more secure because: * Using bastion is more secure because: